H&N Publications INTERNATIONAL

Volume 1, Issue I, Page 1-5

Research Article

Effect of PGR (Humex) on the Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Md. Tanbir Hasan*,
Md. Tanbir Hasan*,

*On-Farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bogura, Bangaldesh. Email: [email protected]

Md. Shahidul Alam,
Md. Shahidul Alam,

On-Farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bogura, Bangaldesh.

Most. Arzuman Akther
Most. Arzuman Akther

Tuber Crop Research Sub-Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bogura, Bangladesh.

and Md. Aminul Islam
Md. Aminul Islam

On-Farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bogura, Bangladesh.


Received: 20 March, 2021 || Accepted: 23 April, 2021 || Published: 26 April, 2021

 

A b s t r a c t

The experiment was conducted during rabi season 2018-2019 at Agricultural Research Station, On-Farm Research Division (OFRD), Bogura, to determine the effects of Plant Growth Regulator (PGR) (Humex) on the growth and yield of tomato. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five treatments in three compacted replicates blocks. The treatments included T1=Recommended inorganic fertilizer + 4.16 kg Humex, T2=Recommended inorganic fertilizer + 8.33 kg Humex, T3=Recommended inorganic fertilizer + 12.5 kg Humex, T4=Recommended inorganic fertilizer + 16.66 kg Humex,and T5=Recommended inorganic fertilizer. The highest yield was observed in T4 (84.59 t ha-1) due to more fruit and the highest weight of fruit per plant, which was statistically similar to all other treatments. The highest gross return was recorded in T4 (BDT. 676720 ha-1), and the lowest was in T5 (BDT. 640160 ha-1). The highest gross margin was found in T4 (BDT. 301455 ha-1) and the lowest in T5 (BDT. 264895 ha-1). This result indicated that humex can increase the yield of tomato.

 

Keywords: Plant Growth Regulator, yield, and economic return

 

Copyright information: Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


References

  1. Abdel-Monaim M.F., Abdel-Gaid M.A., El-Morsy M.E.-M.A. (2012). Efficacy of rhizobacteria and humic acid for controlling Fusarium wilt disease and im-provement of plant growth, quantitative and quali-tative parameters in tomato. ESci Journal of Plant Pathology, 1: 39–48.
  2. Ahmed, K. U. (1976). “PhulPhal O ShakShabji (in Bangla)”. 2nd Edition, AlhajKamaluddin Ahmed, Banglow No. 2, Farm Gate, Dhaka, Bangladesh., p. 470.
  3. Aman S., Rab A. (2013). Response of tomato to nitrogen levels with or without humic acid. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 29: 181–186.
  4. Ameri A., Tehranifar A. (2012). Effect of humic acid on nutrient uptake and physiological characteristic Fragaria ananassa var. Camarosa. Journal of Bio-logical and Environmental Sciences, 6: 77–79.
  5. Asri F.O., Demirtas E.I., Ari N. (2015). Changes in fruit yield, quality and nutrient concentrations in re-sponse to soil humic acid applications in processing tomato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21: 585–591.
  6. Baldotto L.E.B., Baldotto M.A., Canellas L.P., Bressan-Smith R., Olivares F.L. (2010). Growth promotion of pineapple ‘Vitória’ by humic acids and Burkhold-eria spp. during acclimatization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 34: 1593–1600. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000500012.
  7. Batlang U. (2008). Benzyladenine plus gibberellins (GA4+7) increase fruit size and yield in greenhouse grown hot pepper (Capsicum annuumL.). J. Biol. Sci., 8(3): 659-662.
  8. Burkowska A., Donderski W. (2007). Impact of humic substances on bacterioplankton in eutrophic lake. Polish Journal of Ecology, 55: 155–160.
  9. Chowdhury, B. (1979). Vegetables. 6th Edition, The Director, National Book Trust, New Delhi, India. p.46.
  10. Chen Y., De Nobili M., Aviad T. (2004). Stimulatory ef-fects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Mag-doff F., Weil R.R. (Eds.), Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 103–130. DOI: 10.1201/9780203496374.ch4.
  11. Cimrin K.M., Yilmaz I. (2005). Humic acid applications to lettuce do not improve yield but do improve phos-phorus availability. Acta Agriculturae Scandina-vica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science, 55: 58–63. DOI: 10.1080/09064710510008559.
  12. El-Ghamry A.M., Abd El-Hai K.M., Ghoneem K.M. (2009). Amino and humic acids promote growth, yield and disease resistance of faba bean cultivated in clayey soil. Australian Journal of Basic and Ap-plied Sciences, 3: 731–739.
  13. Fahramand M., Moradi H., Noori M., Sobhkhizi A., Adibian M., Abdollahi S., Rigi K. (2014). Influence of humic acid on increase yield of plants and soil properties. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 3: 339–341.
  14. Farnia A., Moradi E. (2015). Effect of soil and foliar appli-cation of humic acid on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Jour-nal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 4(10): 706–716.
  15. Ferdous, Z., A. Datta and M Anwar. (2017). Plastic mulch and indigenous microorganism effects on yield and yield attributes of cauliflower and tomato in inland and coastal regions of Bangladesh.J. Crop Improv., 31:26 279.
  16. Ferdous Z, Ullah H, Datta A, Anwar M, Ali M. (2018). Yield and Profitability of Tomato as Influenced by Integrated Application of Synthetic Fertilizer and Biogas Slurry. International Journal of Vegetable Science., 24: 445–455.
  17. Kazemi M. (2013). Vegetative and reproductive growth of tomato plants affected by calcium and humic acid. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 2(11): 24–29.
  18. Kazemi M. 2014. Effect of foliar application of humic acid and calcium chloride on tomato growth. Bul-letin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sci-ences 3(3): 41–46.
  19. Keeling A.A., McCallum K.R., Beckwith C.P. (2003). Ma-ture green waste compost enhances growth and nitro-gen uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) through the action of water-extractable factors. Bioresource Technology, 90: 127–132. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00125-1.
  20. McDonnell R., Holden N.M., Ward S.M., Collins J.F., Farrell E.P., Hayes M.H.B. (2001). Characteristics of humic substances in heathland and forested peat soils of the Wicklow Mountains. Biology and En-vironment, 101: 187–197.
  21. Mikkelsen R.L. (2005). Humic materials for agriculture. Better Crops with Plant Food, 89: 6–7, 10.
  22. Moraditochaee M. (2012). Effects of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sci-ence, 7: 289–293.
  23. Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Muscolo A., Vianello A. (2002). Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34: 1527–1536. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.
  24. Phookan, D.B., Shadeque, A. and Baruah, P. J. (1991). Effect of growth regulators on yield and quality of Tomato. Vegetable Science., 18.1: 93-96.
  25. Patil R. (2010). Effect of potassium humate and depro-teinised juice (DPJ) on seed germination and seed-ling growth of wheat and jowar. Annals of Biolog-ical Research, 1: 148–151.
  26. Pettit R.E. (2004). Organic matter, humus, humate, humic acid, fulvic acid and humin: their importance in soil fertility and plant health. CTI Research, p. 15.
  27. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  28. Raiola A, Rigano MM, Calafiore R, Frusciante L, Barone A (2014). Enhancing the human-promoting effects of tomato fruit for bofortified food. Hindawi Publishing CorporationMediators of Inflammation. doi:10.1155/2014/139873
  29. Sarir M.S., Sharif M., Zeb A., Akhlaq M. (2005). Influence of different levels of humic acid application by var-ious methods on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 21: 75–81.
  30. Serrani JC, M Fos, A Atare´s, JL Garc1´a-Mart1´nez (2007). Effect of gibberellin and auxin on parthenocarpic fruit growth induction in the cv Micro-Tom 3 of tomato. J. Plant Growth Regultor, 26: 211-221.
  31. Sittu, G.A. and J.A. Adelckha. (1999). Effect of gibberellic acid on the growth and development of tomato (Lycopersicon esculenturn Mill.), cultivar 158-163. Globali. Pure Appl. Sd., 5(1): 27-30.
  32. Singh, D. K. and Singh, R.P. 1993. Varietal response to 2,4-D chlorophenoxy acetic acid and methods of its application on summer tomato. Indian j. Agric. Sci., 63(5): 276 – 282.
  33. Singh, D.K. and Singh, R.P. (1996). Effect of 2,4-D on seed yield and quality characters of tomato (Lyco. sculentum). Advances in hort. & Forestry, 5(1): 87 – 96.
  34. Singh, D.K. and Lal, G. (2002). Effect of plant bio-regulators on the growth and yield of tomato (Lyco. Esculentum Mill.). Prog. Hort., 33(1): 60- 64.
  35. Tan K.H. (2003). Humic Matter in Soil and the Environ-ment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, p. 408. DOI: 10.1201/9780203912546.
  36. Unlu H.O., Unlu H., Karakurt Y., Padem H. (2011). Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to fo-liar and soil humic acid application in cucumber. Scientific Research and Essays, 6: 2800–2803. DOI: 10.5897/SRE11.304.
  37. Varanini Z., Pinton R. (1995). Humic substances and plant nutrition. In: Behnke H.D., Lüttge U., Esser K., Ka-dereit J.W., Runge M. (Eds.), Progress in Botany, 56: 97–117. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79249-6_5.
  38. Wilcox J, G Catignani, C Lazarus (2003). Tomatoes and cardiovascular health.Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 43(1):1-18.
  39. Wu, C. W. Lin, J.Y; Tarug, S.F. and Cheeru. J.L. (1983). 1. Effect of plant growth regulators on the Growth and development of tomato H. Effect of plant growth regulators on vegetative Growth of tomato. J.Agric. Assoc, 124: 31-42.
  40. Wu Z, Sun S, Wang F, Guo D (2011) Establishment of regeneration and transformation system of Lycopresiconesculentum Micro tom. Br Biotechnol J, 3:53–60.
  41. Yildirim E. (2007). Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agricul-turae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science, 57: 182–186. DOI: 10.1080/09064710600813107

  Article View: 2850 times

      

Quick Links

Latest Article

First Report on The Occurrence of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Ginger (Zingiber officinale) in Bangladesh

Performance of Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Species on The Productivity of Rice Under Field Condition

Selecting Parents for Hybridization with Multivariate Analysis Approach to Improve Country Bean (Dolichos lablab L.) Yield

Efficacy of Insecticides in Decreasing the Population of Aphids (Aphis fabae) and Pod Borer (Maruca vitrata) in Country Bean

Genetic Analysis of Fiber Yield Associated Anatomical Traits in Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.)

Morphological Characterization of the Varietal Traits of Jute and Kenaf Seeds in Bangladesh