International Journal for Asian Contemporary Research, 1(4): 162-169

Review Article

“Dewey” and Education Research: Systematic Quantitative Reviews from 1992–2019

Alan Jerry Pan*
Alan Jerry Pan*

*Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. Email: [email protected]

Received: 13 October, 2021 || Accepted: 10 November, 2021 || Published: 11 November, 2021


A b s t r a c t

Where English is the national language, education research journals in the English language are a forefront of teaching democracy to those tasked to inculcate students with necessarily aptitudes to succeed in a democratic society. Where this education fails, Habermas’s argument for communicative action is comparative for the purpose of this research to help clarify John Dewey’s argument on democracy. The failure of democracy into a sociative society is discussed as indicators of the existence of democracy. Perspectives of a “Great Community” are mapped, and Dewey’s argument for education, communication, and community as critical foundations for democratic communications are analyzed. These arguments are discussed in the context of moving forward in an Asian context.

Keywords: Education, development, democracy and control.


Copyright information: Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

    To cite this article: Pan, A.J. (2021). “Dewey” and Education Research: Systematic Quantitative Reviews from 1992 – 2019. International Journal for Asian Contemporary Research, 1 (4): 162-169.  


  1. Antonio, R, Kellner, D (1992). Communication, Modernity, and Democracy in Habermas and Dewey. Symbolic Interaction, 15(3): 277-297.
  2. Ariely, G (2015). Democracy-Assessment in Cross-National Surveys: a Critical Examination of How People Evaluate their Regime. Social Indicators Research, 121(3): 621-635.
  3. Atkins, S, Lewin, S, Smith, H, Engel, M, Fretheim, A, Volmink, J (2008). Conducting a Meta-Ethnography of Qualitative Literature: Lessons Learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1): 21-31.
  4. Benjamin, R (2012). Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations in the Analysis of Text Difficulty. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1): 63-88.
  5. Biddle, C, Azano, A (2016). Constructing and Reconstructing the “Rural School Problem”: A Century of Rural Education Research. Review of Research in Education, 40(3): 298-325.
  6. Carothers, T (1997). Democracy without Illusions. Foreign Affairs, 76(1): 85-99.
  7. Cerulo, K (2016). Why Do We Publish? The American Sociologist, 47(2): 151-157.
  8. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2020). Development Process. Retrieved from
  9. Cywar, A (1969). John Dewey in World War I: Patriotism and International Progressivism. American Quarterly, 21(3): 578-594.
  10. Dennis, L (1981). Publish and/or Perish? Peabody Journal of Education, 58(4): 200-203.
  11. Department of Justice (2015). Overview of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 USC A§1681 et seq. Retrieved from
  12. Dewey, J (1946). The Public and its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Chicago: Gateway Books.
  13. Division of Adult Education and Literacy (1991). Adult Education Act: 1966-1991. US Department of Education, retrieved from
  14. Dotts, B (2016). Dewey Anticipates Habermas’s Paradigm of Communication: The Critique of Individualism and the Basis for Moral Authority in Democracy and Education. Education and Culture, 32(1): 111-129.
  15. Encyclopedia Britannica (2020). National Defense Education Act. Retrieved from
  16. Encyclopedia Britannica (2020). The Theory of Communicative Action. Retrieved from
  17. Fidler, D (2008). A Theory of Open-Source Anarchy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 15(1): 259-284.
  18. Fleming, L (2011). Civic Participation: a Curriculum for Democracy. American Secondary Education, 40(1): 39-50.
  19. Glaeser, E, Ponzetto, G, Shleifer, A (2007). Why Does Democracy Need Education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12(2): 77-99.
  20. Guoqi, X (2014). Chinese and Americans: A Shared History. Harvard University Press.
  21. Hall, A (1945). Science, Education, and Democracy. The News Letter of the College English Association, 7(2): 4.
  22. Held, D (1997). Democracy and Globalization. Global Governance, 3(3): 251-267.
  23. Hickman, L (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
  24. Homan, S, Hewitt, M, Linder, J (1994). The Development and Validation of a Formula for Measuring Single-Sentence Test Item Readability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(4): 349-358.
  25. Ikenberry, J, Kupchan, C (1990). Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization, 44(3): 283-315.
  26. Kaye, S (2008). Why Publish? Academe, 94(3): 33-34.
  27. Kleinnijenhuis, J, Ridder, J (1988). Artificial Intelligence and Content Analysis. Quality and Quantity, retrieved from
  28. Krancberg, S (1982). Karl Marx and Democracy. Studies in Soviet Thought, 24(1): 23-35.
  29. Leeson, P (2007). Efficient Anarchy. Public Choice, 130(1): 41-53.
  30. Lichter, D, Brown, D (2011). Rural America in an Urban Society: Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1): 565-592.
  31. Loughran, T, McDonald, B (2014). The Journal of Finance, 69(4): 1643-1671.
  32. Love, N (1989). Foucault & Habermas on Discourse & Democracy. Polity, 22(2): 269-293.
  33. Martin, J (2002). The Education of John Dewey: a Biography. Columbia University Press.
  34. Matsui, S, Asano, C, and Matsuda, Y (1989). A System for Generating Publication Statistics based on Bibliographic Information: Bibliometric Analysis for the Development of Economic and Social Thought. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 30(2): 121-156.
  35. Microsoft Bing (2020). Discordance. Retrieved from
  36. Morgan, J, Shermis, S (1970). Origin, Theory and Practice: Dewey’s Early Philosophy. Midcontinent American Studies Journal, 11(1): 65-79.
  37. Niemi, J (2005). Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Rationality: The Foundational Distinction Between Communicative and Strategic Action. Social Theory and Practice, 31(4): 513-532.
  38. Pennock, J (1979). Democratic Political Theory. Princeton University Press.
  39. Philipsen, B, Tondeur, J, Roblin, N, Vanslambrouck, S, Zhu, C (2019). Improving Teacher Professional Development for Online and Blended Learning: a Systematic Meta-Aggregative Review. Education Tech Research Dev, 67(1): 1145-1174.
  40. Roosevelt, T (1910). The Strenuous Life. Retrieved from
  41. Salton, G (1970). Automatic Text Analysis. Science, 168(3929): 335-343.
  42. Schafer, (2001). W. E. B. Du Bois, German Social Thought, and the Racia Divide in American Progressivism, 1892-1909. The Journal of American History, 88(3): 925-949.
  43. Shook, J (2007). John Dewey and Edward Scribner Ames: Partners in Religious Naturalism. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 28(2): 178-207.
  44. Smith, P, Ziegler, M (2008). Liberal and Illiberal Democracy in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(1): 31-57.
  45. (2004). Text Analyzer. Retrieved from
  46. Tondeur, J, Braak, J, Sang, G, Voogt, J, Fisser, P, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A (2012). Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology in Education: a Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1): 134-144.
  47. Valk, I (2003). Racism, a Threat to Global Peace. International Journal of Peace Studies, 8(2): 45-66.
  48. VTT (1929). John Dewey’s Seventieth Anniversary. The Journal of Educational Research, 20(5): 373-375.
  49. Weinberg, A (1990). Technology and Democracy. Minerva, 28(1): 81-90.
  50. Wortham, S (2006). Counter-Institutions: Jacques Derrida and the Question of the University. Fordham University Press.

  Article View: 3927 times